What forces need to combine to lay the foundations of a significant global reduction of carbon emissions? To drive significant change, it's not just one way, it's a number of ways. Let's call it using both the 'carrot and stick'. The global awakening to climate change has been rumbling along for a number of years but we are all aware that within the last twelve months it's gathered into a new pace. 2021 is predicted to be ‘the year of the environment’.
Let’s go back to our four categories:
Science: Billions of dollars has flowed from governments and private sources to fund climate change research. When an issue sees significant uptake by the public and media channels, governments wake up, and there is a cyclical effect with one driving the other.
Public Opinion: We've seen protests in major cities across the world and the rise of protest movements such as Extinction Rebellion. Apocalyptic imagery fuels media coverage, which has even led to a condition called ‘eco-anxiety’. Climate change is ranked as the most important issue of our time by Generation Z.
Government Policy: The UK government’s 2008 Climate Change Act and the secondary legislation passed in 2019 commits business and other organisations to net zero carbon emissions by 2050. The UK is currently not on target to meet this goal.
Price: The overlooked category and the one I want to consider. It is a crucial piece of the puzzle.
Sometimes the market needs to be driven by purely economics. In the UK we have had a number of carbon taxes/schemes over the years, with two that have had a direct impact on the wholesale price of energy. EU ETS scheme and the Carbon price floor. The first started with an intention of taxing carbon emitting generators and started to do a reasonable job when it was trading at 30 euros a tonne in 2006; but then it crashed because of oversupply and miss calculation, which took the pressure off the energy markets for a number of years. The UK then introduced the carbon floor price in 2013 to make sure the pressure stayed on generators. What inevitably happened was that some of the increases hit customers in the back pocket as the 'tax' filtered into the wholesale commodity markets. But it did succeed because it pushed ‘polluters’ off the grid to be replaced by greener technology—because of pure economics. It was painful, but price pushed change.
This is merely round one, despite carbon prices rising over 70% in the last twelve months. As painful as it may be price will have to rise even further to stimulate the innovation of carbon free technologies and push, not just energy businesses away from carbon emission, but the global population as a whole.
This needs to be a careful balancing act because any change to the price of carbon, as we have seen over the last decade, gets pushed through to consumers as it filters into the electricity price. Forcing electricity prices higher, especially when global economies are under strain and unemployment is on the rise, is not an appetising solution. It’s imperative policy makers create incentives and make sure the vulnerable are protected.
Price does once again need to drive change, with innovators, generators and consumers having a clear view of the future with the opportunities and risks clearly defined.
If you would like to talk about how to effectively manage risks linked to the carbon market price, please give the edenseven team a call.
Pete Nisbet (Managing Partner, edenseven)
5 High Green,
Cambridge, CB22 5EG
+44 (0)1223 750335
45 Beech Street
London, EC2Y 8AD
+44 (0)1223 750335
2 rue Paul Borel
75017, Paris
+44 (0)1202 045532
14 Abba Hillel Silver Road
Ramat Gan
Israel 5250607