UK CBAM: What It Means for Your Business

What Do Your Scope 3 Emissions Have to Do with Inflation? Scope 3 emissions cover everything outside your direct operations —the carbon footprint of your supply chain, purchased goods, logistics, business travel, and more. The higher your Scope 3 emissions, the more energy-intensive your supply chain is. And the more energy-intensive your supply chain, the more vulnerable you are to rising costs. Think of it this way: High Production Costs- If your suppliers are heavily dependent on fossil fuels, their production costs are rising fast. Price Volatility- If your supply chain lacks efficiency and resilience, price volatility will hit you harder. Locking in High Costs- If you’re not actively engaging with suppliers to reduce emissions, you’re locking in long-term cost increases that could have been avoided. Without accurate Scope 3 data and a clear engagement strategy , businesses are leaving themselves open to higher prices, lower margins, and greater financial risk . Why Businesses Struggle to Tackle This A major challenge is that Procurement and Sustainability teams often operate in silos: Procurement teams focus on cost and supplier relationships but often lack deep sustainability expertise. Sustainability teams focus on compliance and decarbonisation but aren’t typically measured on financial performance. This disconnect means emissions reduction is rarely treated as a financial opportunity —when in reality, cutting carbon from your supply chain is also one of the most effective ways to reduce exposure to cost inflation. The Businesses That Get This Right Will Win Leading organisations are already taking action. They are: Gathering detailed Scope 3 emissions data to map out cost risks in their supply chain. Engaging suppliers to drive efficiency, reduce emissions, and lower costs. Building resilience by shifting towards lower-carbon, more cost-stable alternatives. The result? Lower long-term costs, reduced financial risk, and a competitive edge over those stuck with inefficient supply chains. This is not just about sustainability compliance —it’s about smart financial decision-making. If You’re Not Taking Action, You’re Losing Money Every business will feel the impact of rising supply chain costs—but not every business will be prepared for them. If you don’t have accurate Scope 3 emissions data and an effective engagement strategy, you are: Paying more than you need to for essential goods and services. Exposing your business to long-term cost inflation. Missing out on opportunities to build a stronger, more resilient supply chain. The sooner you act, the better—for your bottom line and for the planet. Is your business ready to take control of its costs? Get in touch today.

Over the last few decades, carbon offsetting has become a go-to strategy for businesses looking to demonstrate sustainability commitments and enhance their external credibility. Offsetting takes many forms, from tree planting and forest conservation to providing communities with clean cookstoves and renewable energy. However, with a vast number of offset providers offering projects of varying credibility, navigating this landscape can be confusing for businesses and consumers alike. The Problem with Offsetting While carbon offsetting can play a role in broader climate action, it is not a substitute for direct emissions reductions. Protecting and enhancing nature and biodiversity should be seen as complementary to carbon reduction—not a replacement for it. Lack of Additionality - Many offsetting projects do not actually remove additional carbon from the atmosphere beyond what would have happened anyway. Distraction from True Action - Offsetting can divert attention from the urgent need to tackle emissions at the source, delaying meaningful business-wide carbon reductions. Regulatory and Reputational Risks - The EU is set to ban terms like "climate/carbon neutral" or "climate positive" based on offsetting from 2026, increasing the risk of greenwashing accusations for businesses wishing to claim climate positives from offsetting projects. Several large companies have already rolled back offset-based sustainability claims after using unreliable carbon offsets. Should you Avoid Offsetting Entirely? Not necessarily. High-quality carbon offsets can still be a useful tool to support broader sustainability efforts, and often provide social benefits, while supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, they should only come after a business has taken concrete steps to measure and reduce emissions. The Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi), a leading assessor of corporate science-based Net Zero targets, only permits the offsetting of residual, unavoidable emissions (less than 10% of a company's total emissions) after all other feasible reduction measures have been implemented. This further highlights the importance of prioritsing direct emissions reductions before considering any forms of offsetting. Before investing in offsets, ensure you: Measure Your Carbon Footprint - This should include Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, to provide a full picture of your environmental impact. Without this data, you are unable to make informed carbon reductions. Develop a Robust Carbon Reduction Plan - Your plan should cover Scope 1, 2 and 3, align with the goals of the Paris Agreement, and set ambitious reduction targets. Take Action and Track Progress - Implement emissions reduction initiatives and continuously monitor progress towards Net Zero. If your business meets these criteria, investing in credible, high-quality offsetting schemes can be an additional way to contribute to climate action. However, if these foundational steps are not in place, offsetting alone is not the answer for your business - it does little to drive real change. What We Offer At edenseven, we help businesses design and implement data-driven sustainability strategies that prioritise real emissions reductions. Our cloud-based platform, cero.earth , simplifies carbon accounting and management, ensuring compliance with climate regulations and providing a clear roadmap to Net Zero. With expert guidance from edenseven, your business can avoid greenwashing pitfalls and take meaningful action to cut emissions, comply with regulations, ensure credibility with stakeholders, and reduce costs. Want to build a credible, impactful sustainability strategy? Get in touch today.

In January 2025 , gas accounted for 38% of Britain’s electricity mix, the highest contribution among all sources. This represented an 11% lead over wind energy and a 2% increase compared to January 2024. Wind energy, however, delivered its lowest January contribution in the past four years, comprising 27% of the energy mix. Nuclear and imports each saw a 3% increase, contributing 12% of Britain’s electricity generation. Contributions from solar, hydro, and biomass remained stable compared to January 2024, with solar and hydro each accounting for 2% and biomass 6%. Coal, which was phased out of UK electricity generation in September 2024, delivered 0% of electricity in January 2025. For comparison, coal contributed 2% in January 2024, equal to the individual shares of solar and hydro. Zero-carbon sources made up 43% of Britain’s electricity generation in January 2025—the lowest proportion for January in the past four years. This was 4% lower than in January 2024 and 13% lower than January 2023. However, the rolling 12-month average for zero-carbon sources reached 51%, the highest of the past four years and 2% higher than the previous 12-month period. The carbon intensity of electricity generation in January 2025 was 168 gCO₂/kWh, the second highest of the past four years. Despite this, the rolling 12-month average carbon intensity fell to 125 gCO₂/kWh—a 19% reduction compared to the prior year and the lowest of the past four years, underscoring progress in decarbonisation. Increasing renewable electricity generation remains crucial to achieving net-zero goals, enhancing energy security, and reducing reliance on imports.

Contributing Authors: Pete Nisbet, Alejandro Navarro, Craig Cheney In their 2020 report, the Climate Change Committee emphasised the importance of local authorities in national decarbonisation efforts and the UK’s journey to net zero. Quoting the capacity to impact roughly one third of UK emissions, the report highlighted the significant remit of local authorities, including local transport, social housing, and waste, as well as their influence over local businesses and communities. Unlike private entities and businesses – which also contribute significantly to UK emissions yet often exhibit limited willingness to respond* – local authorities have demonstrated a clear commitment to addressing climate change. Out of 394 local authorities, 327 have declared a climate emergency, with 114 setting net-zero targets and 280 developing actionable plans. This highlights the readiness of local authorities to act; however, translating this enthusiasm into meaningful outcomes requires clearer direction and support from central government. While the new government has shown a willingness to address these challenges, the reality is that news policies and funding mechanisms take time to develop and implement. Bridging this gap between ambition and action will be crucial to unlocking the full potential of local authorities in driving the UK’s net-zero agenda. One stand-out and wide-reaching solution to this is climate technology . With the ability to process data more effectively, identify problems faster, and test solutions virtually, technology provides an efficient, transformative vessel for decarbonisation and net zero strategies. In a recent survey, 40% of senior executives said they believe that digital technologies are already having a positive impact on their sustainability goals. And, with the ability to initiate significant carbon reductions across energy, materials, and mobility, and save money at the same time, climate tech has the potential to provide the public sector with the resources it needs toward net zero. *According to our recent analysis of the FTSE 250, 41% of the FTSE 250 do not have a net zero target, and those who do have delayed it by an average of 13 months.

A review of Britain's electricity generation over the past four years, including the contributing energy sources, carbon intensity, proportion of zero-carbon sources and further insights.

In December 2024, wind energy accounted for the highest proportion of Britain’s electricity mix among all energy types, contributing 39%. Gas contributed 29%, which was a 3% increase from December 2023. Although wind's contribution was higher than in December 2021 and 2022, it was 2% below the 41% recorded in December 2023. Imports reached their highest level for December in the past four years, supplying 10% of Britain’s electricity mix, which is 3% more than in December 2023. Contributions from biomass, hydro, solar and storage remained stable compared to December 2023, providing 6%, 3%, 1% and 1%, respectively. Nuclear energy saw a 2% decrease in its contributions, delivering 12% of the mix in December 2024, the lowest level for December in the past four years. Coal contributed 0% after its phaseout from Britain's electricity generation in September of the previous year. Zero-carbon sources comprised 56% of Britain's electricity generation, marking the second highest level for December in the last four years; however, 4% lower than for December in the previous year. Despite this decline, the rolling 12-month average for zero-carbon sources was 51%, the highest of the last four years. The carbon intensity of electricity generation in December 2024 was 126 gCO₂/kWh, representing a 3% increase compared to December of the previous year. However, the rolling 12-month average was 125 gCO₂/kWh, indicating a 17% reduction compared to the previous 12-months and the lowest level in four years, reflecting ongoing decarbonisation efforts. Increasing electricity generation from renewable sources is essential for achieving our net-zero goals, ensuring energy security, and reducing reliance on imports.

In November 2024, gas was Britain's primary electricity source, accounting for 38% of the mix, a 7% increase from November 2023. Wind energy contributed 27%, 4% lower than the previous year, marking its lowest November share in four years. Nuclear, biomass, solar, and hydro maintained their contributions from 2023 at 12%, 7%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. Nuclear's share was 4% below November 2021, the lowest in four years. Coal contributed 0% after the closure of the last coal-fired power plant, Ratcliffe, in September, while imports provided 11%, the second-highest November level in four years. Zero-carbon sources made up 42% of Britain's electricity generation, the lowest for November in four years and 5% lower than last year. However, the rolling 12-month average for zero-carbon sources is 51%, the highest in the same period. The carbon intensity of electricity generation in November 2024 was 171 gCO₂/kWh, an increase of 6% from November in the previous year. The rolling 12-month average dropped to 124 gCO₂/kWh, marking a 21% reduction and the lowest level in four years, reflecting ongoing decarbonization efforts. Increasing the electricity generation from renewable sources can help achieve our net-zero ambitions, ensure energy security, and decrease reliance on imports.

Mawdsleys signs a long-term agreement to use edenseven’s market-leading carbon reporting and management platform, cero.earth, to monitor all emissions and programmes of work to reach net zero . Mawdsleys is the UK’s largest independent pharmaceutical distributor. Established nearly 200 years ago, they have a fast-growing international network supplying medicines to meet patient needs and providing a route to market for manufacturers. Mawdsleys has signed a long term agreement with edenseven to use their carbon accounting and management platform, cero.earth. Built by edenseven, cero.earth is a cloud-based carbon accounting and management platform that provides businesses with a complete view of their emissions and decarbonisation plan. Using a dynamic view of all three emissions scopes, cero.earth provides a clear understanding of the current position against net zero targets and allows for the proactive monitoring of both current and planned projects. With a need to monitor and decarbonise operations at pace, Mawdsleys will leverage cero.earth to assess their current sustainability targets and produce a dynamic delivery plan to eradicate emissions permanently from their supply chain. Pete Nisbet, Managing Partner of edenseven, said: “We continue to evolve cero.earth to make sure we are providing our customers with the tools to dynamically monitor their decarbonisation programmes in a clear and practical manner. We are very excited to be working with Mawdsleys and are certain that, by embedding cero.earth into their net zero deliver plan, we can collectively make significant quantifiable environmental and financial gains.” William Sanders, CEO of Mawdsleys, commented; “Mawdsleys are leading the way in our sector, working towards net zero. Investment into thousands of solar panels and cutting edge battery storage technology, as well as operating electric vehicles, up to and including an HGV, makes edenseven the perfect partner to assist monitoring our decarbonisation plans. Mawdsleys are a key part of the healthcare system, delivering critical medicines to hospitals every day, so utilising cero.earth will help us maintain and enhance our position in the NHS Evergreen benchmarking assessment.” 

Thames Freeport is a unique initiative designed to stimulate trade and innovation and transform the lives of people in its region, leveraging global connectivity to over 130 ports in 65 countries. Occupying a strategic position with intermodal capabilities across river, rail, and road, Thames Freeport has recognised its opportunity to achieve social good, and has demonstrated an active commitment to advancing decarbonisation and fostering a circular economy. Thames Freeport is emerging as a hub for clean energy technologies, advanced logistics, and value-added manufacturing. Special Economic Zones (SEZs) such as the Thames Freeport are uniquely positioned to drive decarbonisation. By clustering industries and research institutions, SEZs enable collaboration on sustainable practices and green technology development. This concentration accelerates the adoption of renewable energy sources, smart grids, and circular economy practices.